King Stromba said:'If you like a car to be stable under braking, again the Trophy is a poor handling car as it bucks and fights under braking.
jezza l said:since im still running in i've not done any hard braking in the trophy but i know on my old full fat the back would become so light under very hard braking from high speeds.
could argue that a supra is a "proper race car" but i know what you mean.
hyb said:News Flash : stromba kills thread with usualy blurb no one bothers to read once again.
we'll be back after these commercials
nick when you say you have uprated brakes what have you dun to them :?: :?:Nik said:Yeah, I know what you're saying Stromba, no arguments from me with the theory. Larger cars are obviously more stable under braking and and as you say the Trophy's weight distribution and ride height means (partly by design) that the rear end goes very light under hard braking.
It's not as bad as you like to suggest though, and it certainly doesn't go all loose and buck about unless you deliberately provoke it. I've got uprated brakes on the Trophy and on track i'm usually braking as hard as possible to do so without the ABS kicking in and the car feels very stable. Certainly braking in a straight line there's no instability at all, but yes, if you start trail braking into corners then you're going to need to be more cautious.
I agree though, these topics are generally pointless as people have their reasons for preferring one car over another and thats all that matters. I'd love the Honda engine but all things considered, the Clio is the better car for me.