what is your power and torque figuers?

hoolio · Oct 11, 2008

BenG said:
That Supercharged Clio was insane ! :twisted:

This car is featured in next months Performance french car mag, may be worth standing around in a newsagents for a few minutes.

harratt21trophy · Oct 11, 2008

yozzasport exhaust with decat
panel filter
inlets matched (gdi)
remap (gdi)

192bhp at 6445rpm / 224nm of torque at 5410 rpm. thinkin about removin the acoustic valve box out and fitting a
moxogen with a good air feed then gettin it live mapped, wheres best for live mappin??? havnt got a scanner so carnt
post the graph

shiftspark · Oct 11, 2008

harratt21trophy said:
yozzasport exhaust with decat
panel filter
inlets matched (gdi)
remap (gdi)

192bhp at 6445rpm / 224nm of torque at 5410 rpm. thinkin about removin the acoustic valve box out and fitting a
moxogen with a good air feed then gettin it live mapped, wheres best for live mappin??? havnt got a scanner so carnt
post the graph

RS tuning in Leeds is good but cant vouch for others.
Try taking a photo as I did of your graph.

shiftspark · Oct 11, 2008

hoolio said:
BenG said:

That Supercharged Clio was insane ! :twisted:

Click to expand...

This car is featured in next months Performance french car mag, may be worth standing around in a newsagents for a few minutes.

Not worth buying the mag then :lol:

Cue · Oct 12, 2008

harratt21trophy said:
yozzasport exhaust with decat
panel filter
inlets matched (gdi)
remap (gdi)

192bhp at 6445rpm / 224nm of torque at 5410 rpm. thinkin about removin the acoustic valve box out and fitting a
moxogen with a good air feed then gettin it live mapped, wheres best for live mappin??? havnt got a scanner so carnt
post the graph

where was this done? i'm very sceptical of those figures based on not just my results but everyone elses.. that's nearly 80% increase in torque over mine......

matched inlets - angleworks
maxogen
prospeed

i'd say the decat maybe worth 3 bhp max, that leaves 22 bhp from just the map which is above the normal gains from just a map. the torque though is in a different league, hence the scepticism.

BenR · Oct 12, 2008

224nm is about 165lb.ft

But 156lb.ft at 6500rpm is a bit special.

harratt21trophy · Oct 12, 2008

hi ther will take a picture of it later 2day had it RR at the same place with just an exhaust and decat and it made 185 bhp obviousely every RR out there aint the same but it does pull well il try n sort a video out aswell will post soon.

Matt X2C · Oct 13, 2008

was it a Dyno Dynamics? They are the most accurate.

SharkyUK · Nov 12, 2008

Hi guys - here's the latest dyno plot from last Saturday. The car is still stock and I'm very happy with the result. I'll be using this as my 'baseline' figure for future mod's (hopefully starting sometime in the New Year). Incidentally, this was taken two days prior to having work done and a service at RenTech and the car is pulling and driving better now than in all the time I've had it. Shame I couldn't have had the car looked at before the rolling road day!

Cue · Nov 13, 2008

interesting that your actual wheel bhp is below mine but your est torque figure is above.... I can only presume their estimate is either out or mine is out as a bhp difference of 16 bhp would mean generally speaking more torque.

did they do a fuelling test also? - that'd be useful to see where the potential gains would come.

shiftspark · Nov 13, 2008

Cue said:
interesting that your actual wheel bhp is below mine but your est torque figure is above.... I can only presume their estimate is either out or mine is out as a bhp difference of 16 bhp would mean generally speaking more torque.

did they do a fuelling test also? - that'd be useful to see where the potential gains would come.

Also I think my wheel bhp was around 130 but only 158 flywheel and as is BenG's where yours has higher transmission losses?

SharkyUK · Nov 13, 2008

Cue said:
interesting that your actual wheel bhp is below mine but your est torque figure is above.... I can only presume their estimate is either out or mine is out as a bhp difference of 16 bhp would mean generally speaking more torque.

did they do a fuelling test also? - that'd be useful to see where the potential gains would come.

Definitely interesting... good old dyno lotto! :lol: Sadly there was no fuelling / fuel ratio testing. My results have been consistent on three occasions now over the last 12 months but - still - can only take these results with a pinch of salt.

The best guide as always is how it drives. It compares very favourably with my Good Lady's 216bhp Type-R (although obviously loses out the closer the top end gets).

Cue · Nov 13, 2008

most important thing i that you have a baseline figure to work with when looking into new mods....

S4M · Nov 13, 2008

182

Luke335 · Nov 18, 2008

That's impressive for standard. Are you sure someone hasn't chipped it already?

Modified, mine made 181bhp, 156lb/ft on the DynoDynamics RR at Sanspeed.

Maxogen,
Manifold match,
Orbisoud,
Superchip.
At first I was a bit dissapointed with the max Bhp figure, but the car has a much better midrange than previously. Saves me having to work the gears so much!

SharkyUK · Nov 18, 2008

Cue said:
interesting that your actual wheel bhp is below mine but your est torque figure is above.... I can only presume their estimate is either out or mine is out as a bhp difference of 16 bhp would mean generally speaking more torque.

Re: the actual wheel bhp... I have been informed that the value on the MAHA dyno plot is not the power at the wheels as we 'understand' it. I've been told it's the wheel/dyno interface power reading which, apparently, is different to wheel power. Whether or not it's true I'm not sure but I'd be interested to know if nothing else! :lol:

Finally got around to sorting out the footage of the run - here it is:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=0eJ2_wEX3Uk

Cheers.