- Joined
- Dec 11, 2005
- Messages
- 1,541
- Reaction score
- 0
- Thread starter
- #3
It's just about OK. I don't find the menus incredibly intuitive, but it isn't bad either.
The annoying thing is that I'm using a FM tuner to pick up the Ipod at the moment which is less than ideal. That said, MP3 is never going to offer great sound quality anyway, so the FM quality isn't a huge loss.
I havn't regretted buying the Ipod, although I do wish they made the new Ipod touch in 160gb versions
Cheers
O.
The annoying thing is that I'm using a FM tuner to pick up the Ipod at the moment which is less than ideal. That said, MP3 is never going to offer great sound quality anyway, so the FM quality isn't a huge loss.
I havn't regretted buying the Ipod, although I do wish they made the new Ipod touch in 160gb versions
Cheers
O.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2007
- Messages
- 596
- Reaction score
- 0
160gb is a pretty impressive capacity. I'd be looking for that kinda space if i was in the market for a new MP3 player - but it wouldnt be an Ipod.
Never been a big fan of Ipods - great from a design point of view but not as a player in my opinion - there are better players out there which are less restrictive and offer more features/functions and most importantly - better sound quality.
Never been a big fan of Ipods - great from a design point of view but not as a player in my opinion - there are better players out there which are less restrictive and offer more features/functions and most importantly - better sound quality.
About time manufacturers started offering this kind of capacity! Finally there is something that might be able to contain my collection - reasonable price too!