Recent content by TheJesus

the owner of this one on here yet???

there wouldn't be many gains on a std engine i'd have thought, most people usually have at least a decat, exhaust and uprated filter first. an honest tuner would tell you to come back with more mods then the difference would be easily noticable

has anyone considered Chip Wizards? He's mapped the Siemans ECU for the Williams, it took a while for him to crack the code and now he can do them at will and it has more flexability than a piggy back. big hp's car made 151bhp at the wheels with basic breathing mods... which is about 180bhp...

bloody hell, twats! nice that they actually sorted it out no fuss though, I don't think you'd normally get that from Reno... this must be one of the better ones :lol:

PGR3 is just pure porn... I'm gonna get a 360 next month or so... still like PGR2 though for the slower cars, shame they took them all out really... still best racing game out to date though imo... love it :D

:wink: :lol:

perfect in theory... if only however! :lol: lol Stromba... it's over mate, you have lost the arguement by virtue you have proven nothing. Thank you for making the car I own also look crap... please don't ever try and argue a case for the Williams as it's embarrassing to read :wink: Don't...

yup, and you didn't listen to him either did you? :roll: :wink: :lol: anyway, is that it? can we put this to bed? Nik, please close this thread now, all points have been covered and the 'only' proof we have that we can go on is journo reviews... who are a more reliable source than...

class, both of those comments are off topic and therefore spam as they have nothing to do with the thread title. I said you would do this and you didn't fail to deliver... you can be read like a book... actually, more like a comic ;) I'm glad we have the laws of physics, but if big Albert...

1st valid point you have made today... lets see if you can improve on it now? :wink:

... he has a rolling road and hence i'm sure he knows how to use it for back to back testing... is that wrong, because if so your basically saying none of the results you get can be taken with a pinch of salt? scientists are only needed when you have someone pedantic enough to argue the toss...

thing is Roberta, your the one looking silly once again, your making EVERY excuse under the sun for being a girly wimp who clearly has no confidence in his ability to change gear and press pedals, or your cars performance (or lack of). just to humour you i'll start by saying "stop putting...

exactly Nik, may as well lock this before it goes completely off topic... I think we all know what KS idea of proof is: "that's the way it is because King Stromba said so!" ... what about the facts? "ha, fool, i'll just bore you to death by constantly going off topic until your eyes...

how so? we're not talking about product testing for safety or effectiveness under water at minus 50 degrees are we? it's a simple case of run the car with and without, all it needs to show is if their is an increase in power... I'd suggest Nick would be able to do this as he knows what he's...